Tagged with australia RSS

Australia 1970

Die, wild country, like the eaglehawk,
dangerous till the last breath’s gone,
clawing and striking. Die
cursing your captor through a raging eye.

Die like the tigersnake
that hisses such pure hatred from its pain
as fills the killer’s dreams
with fear like suicide’s invading stain.

Suffer, wild country, like the ironwood
that gaps the dozer-blade.
I see your living soil ebb with the tree
to naked poverty.

Die like the soldier-ant
mindless and faithful to your million years.
Though we corrupt you with our torturing mind.
stay obstinate; stay blind.

For we are conquerors and self-poisoners
more than scorpion or snake
and dying of the venoms that we make
even while you die of us.

I praise the scoring drought, the flying dust,
the drying creek, the furious animal,
that they oppose us still;
that we are ruined by the thing we kill.

- Judith Wright (as relevant today as in 1970)

Representing Australia is a tricky business. There are almost 23 million of us and it would be logistically impossible to fit us all into Parliament House at Question Time. Hence, we elect candidates to speak on our behalf. Yet, the opinions of Australians are not mirrored in Parliament.

For instance, according to a Roy Morgan poll conducted mid-last year, 68 per cent of Australians support same-sex marriage, while a Nielsen poll, also conducted last year, showed that 53 per cent of Australians supported onshore processing of asylum seekers.

Despite this, the Marriage Equality Amendment Bill is unlikely to pass later this year and both major parties favour offshore processing.

But representing Australia needs to go even deeper than representing opinions. Australian Parliament is made up of individuals from well-off backgrounds. Most are university educated. Many have law degrees. Those who are not ‘career politicians’ would have likely spent stints as union officials, lawyers, or in another white-collar jobs.

There are not many women, migrants or openly gay people. There are not many people who are very young or very old. The Parliament is almost entirely white. There are no Parliamentarians living with a disability.

Parliament doesn’t resemble Australia. This is a problem when parliamentarians draft bills which affect Australians. People with similar backgrounds to each other may have differing opinions, but they will pick out the same kinds of issues as warranting concern and frame debates about those issues in particular ways

This is especially problematic when the government drafts policy which will affect a range of Australians, but is designed essentially to address the concerns that they see – the concerns of people like them.

Palmer vs Swan: who best represents Australia? - The Drum Opinion (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

I wrote this piece for the Drum last week, and it has literally taken me this long to post anything about it. It hasn’t exactly started a conversation about diverse political representation, but hopefully another voice does some good. I like talking about privilege without using the word ‘privilege’.

“They fought for your freedom…”

is a total non-truth. Please stop saying this! I’m sorry, but the only war that Australia had any business being in was World War II. If anything, the reason why Australians went to Gallipoli was so that the British had some extra bodies to expend. That’s the reality. It angers me because people honestly seem to think that war is a ‘necessary evil’ or something absurd like that. It isn’t (possibly WW2 excepted?).

There was a great article posted in Overland yesterday in which the author, Jeff Sparrow writes: ‘Anzac Day celebrates forgetting.’ Even though we say ‘Lest we forget’ ceremoniously, there seems to be a lot of confusion about what happened in World War I, and in Gallipoli especially. Here’s a quick history lesson: Gallipoli was a complete failure. Many people died and in the end Australian forces withdrew by escaping under the cover of darkness, pretending that they were still there through the use of the drip rifle (which is a really cool invention and does say something about the resourcefulness of the Australian armed forces). Hopefully they weren’t fighting for our freedom, because we would have lost it. As Sparrow points out, most of us don’t even know what Gallipoli, or even further, WWI in general, was actually about.

It’s very sad (sad isn’t even a strong enough word, it’s senselessly miserable, it’s unjust) that so many young people, in the prime of their lives, were convinced to go off to war and died. It is a tremendous waste of talent and energy. It prevented many from being able to go back to their friends and families and able to forge a long, happy life for themselves.

The tragedy of ANZAC day is that most war is pointless, not that the soldiers were fighting for something meaningful like freedom. They were not martyrs (and even if they were, how dare anyone say that the sacrifice of human life is ever justified, even for freedom?), they were taken advantage of and executed by insane governments.

ANZAC day is a cold reminder of the danger of war, of the brutal methods wars use to ‘solve problems’, and how very easy it is for us to approve of a war when we’re safe away from its dreadful and dangerous reality.

As young children we are brought up to believe in the ability of mankind to invent its way out of difficulties. In terms of economic progress, this ethos readily converts itself into the mass consumerism of adult society. The current generation of Australians has little memory of any check on material progress. For many, the need for financial sacrifice to solve a public problem, let alone one as complex as global warming, is unthinkable. In this respect, the climate-change debate is a form of culture shock.

Climate change denial not just for fools

Mark Latham being surprisingly intelligent/sensible on why climate change denial is a thing in Australia.

Another example of Australia evading the principles of human rights.

Another example of Australia evading the principles of human rights.

Indeed, this year was a bad year for tyrants and oppressors and baddies of all descriptions. We saw the death of Osama bin Laden at the hands of American action-men, the death of Moamar Gaddafi at the hands of YouTube pranksters, and the death of Kim Jong-il at the hands of communism’s greatest foe, God. It just goes to show you should never give up hope – even when you are being oppressed, downtrodden, and forced to slowly starve to death, you can take heart from the knowledge that eventually the bad guy will drop dead and be replaced by his insane son.

I saw ev­i­dence of this con­stantly dur­ing my time in Curtin. I had re­quested to visit, with plenty of no­tice, a num­ber of de­tainees from a range of coun­tries, in­clud­ing Iran, Afghanistan and Sri Lanka. Many have re­ceived refugee sta­tus by the Aus­tralian gov­ern­ment but are wait­ing in­def­i­nitely for se­cu­rity clear­ance from ASIO (a process with­out trans­parency or ap­peal). One af­ter­noon a Serco em­ployee ad­vised me that it would be pos­si­ble to see more re­quested asy­lum seek­ers the next day but by morn­ing, speak­ing to a dif­fer­ent Serco staff, I was in­formed that it was im­pos­si­ble due to “se­cu­rity” rea­sons. “You should have given us more warn­ing and it could have been arranged,” the man­ager said. Such sto­ries are leg­endary, es­pe­cially in re­mote cen­tres, and often DIAC and Serco seem­ingly aim to refuse vis­i­tor re­quests to de­lib­er­ately upset the iso­lated de­tainees. Such re­fusals, in such a re­mote lo­ca­tion that sees barely any new or fa­mil­iar faces, are against Serco and DIAC rules.

An Open Letter to Chris Bowen, Australian Immigration Minister

(note: I’ve also emailed him a copy. If you feel similarly as I do, please write to him, his email is: chris.bowen@immi.gov.au)


Dear Chris Bowen,

I voted in my first election in 2007, and I did so for the ALP. I figured that after the conservatism and the xenophobia of the Howard government, a Labor alternative would be a breath of fresh air. It would bring progression and compassion back into Australian politics.

I am disappointed. If anything, your policies on asylum seekers are worse than that of the Howard government, a feat I would have thought impossible. I will not be voting for your party again any time soon. But what is at stake here is more than votes. You and your ALP colleagues will soon be directly responsible for killing Ismail, an asylum seeker from Afghanistan. You insist on sending him back to Afghanistan, alleging that he is in no danger there. This is despite that his father was killed by the Taliban and that his family have sought asylum to Pakistan. He has said that ‘I told Immigration it’s OK if they send me, you can send my dead body to my country because either way I’m dead.’

Now, think with empathy for a moment. How would you feel if you were detained for two years despite not having any criminal charges, let alone convictions. How would you feel if in detention you witnessed three suicides and a riot? And how would you feel if a government literally sent you to death? If those two years in detention were in vain, if the final moments of your life had nothing - no knowledge, no freedom. And for what? So listeners of talk-back radio can feel happy? For the saved $400 a fortnight in Centrelink payments? So that a crumbling government can win a few votes? For what? That’s what I want to know, and what Ismail deserves to know, and what you should be responsible for telling him.

The complete and utter disregard for human life exemplified by the ALP’s policies deeply sickens me. And indeed, so does the way in which asylum seekers - especially those arriving by boat - have been bandied about in discourse to score political points, to create an unnecessary atmosphere of fear, and to create demons in people smugglers where in fact terrorists and oppressive governments are the true villains. This issue is precisely why Australia is a frustrating place to live in for those who have some semblance of empathy (not to mention common-sense).

You are lucky that the media, in its duopolistic and deeply conservative way, is unlikely to make a huge fuss over this. This is your gain. But it is at a huge cost to the world.

Congruity is about finding logical answers and cohesion in an inconsistent world. I blog about language, art and the politics of everyday life. I cover debates from new perspective, and try to find sensible answers through the muck. And pretty pictures. Mostly of cats.


My name is Erin. I am a freelance writer and student.I am 22 years old and based in Sydney. My passions are writing and reading but I also love photography, art, Sunday brunches, puzzles, the first pancake off the stove, trashy television, comedy gigs, travel, and making lists.